Urban slum DSS is a longitudinal demographic surveillance system in urban areas. Similar to DSS
in other settings, the primary objective of urban slum DSS is to collect and analyze demographic
and health outcomes from uniquely identified subjects in the DSA through regular repeated visits. In
terms of challenges and constraints, urban slum DSS also faces common challenges and
constraints to DSS in other settings such as lack of funding.
Urban slum DSS has some unique features. One typical feature of an urban slum DSS is the large
and frequent movement of people with in and out of the demographic surveillance area (DSA). The
DSA usually receives a high influx of people of whom some stay longer in the DSA before they
move out again and some leave the DSA after a short stay. Returning back of ex-DSS members to
the DSA is also common in urban slum DSS. Such circular movement of people affects allocation
of unique ID to subjects. The success of a DSS will depend on the complete coverage of core
events, the correctness of all the information relating to them, and the achievement of assigning
unique ID for DSS subjects. In other words, assigning unique IDs for individuals who ever lived in
the DSA and also a unique ID for ever registered household in the DSA is crucial to monitoring
changes over time. However, the huge and frequent movement that are common phenomenon in
urban slum DSS pose a number of unique challenges to urban slum DSS. These include a) a
higher risk of failing to capture all movement and other core demographic events; and b) a higher
risk of assigning more than one unique ID to ever- resident individuals and ever- formed households
in the DSA.
In its urban slum DSS, the
African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC) registers all
individuals in the DSA and follow up subsequently over time to monitor and document changes in
various events, such as: pregnancies, deaths, in- migrations, births, illness episodes, work spells,
health seeking behavior, etc. These events will be recorded only for individuals who qualify as
‘residents’ of the DSA. A person is considered a member of the DSS if he/she has lived in the DSA
for at least 90 days. This means that no inquiry will be made about events that occurred before the
date when the household was first registered in the DSS. The only exception is the registration of
pregnancies and pregnancy outcomes, which are registered irrespective of when they were
conceived. If a DSS member moves out of a DSS household for at least three months (90 days),
he/she will be considered an out- migrant. New people who will move into a household within the
DSA will be registered as in-migrants after they spend at least three months (90 days) in that
household. Between the times such people move into the DSS household and when they get
registered as in-migrants, they will be considered visitors. Births or deaths to visitors are not DSS
events. People who move within the same DSA will be considered as having changed residence,
and such movements will be registered through change of residence forms. Movements of people
into and out-of the DSA will be registered through migration forms.
To keep track of changes that might be observed overtime, the DSS must ensure assigning unique
ID to individuals and households in the DSS. In urban slum DSS where movement is high there is a
high risk of assigning more than one ID to subjects. To minimize assigning a duplicate ID when
using movement forms (for those who changed residence within the DSA or returning in-migrants)
adequate mechanisms should be in place to verify whether the subject had ever been given an ID in
the DSA or to trace the ID if one had ever been given. The ideal thing is to use the ID that was given
earlier if a person was found to have moved into a different dwelling unit or who is a return migrant
to the DSA. This suggests a need to verify the following two issues: a) if the person has ever lived
in the DSA; and b) if the person in-migrating did the movement with the household that is newly
formed or not. The first will help in making decision whether or not a new ID should be assigned to
the person whereas the second point relates to whether or not a new ID for the household should
be given. To facilitate searching for existing IDs for DSA-ever- lived individuals, some matching
questions need to be included. APHRC makes some effort to handle these challenges. First it
includes some questions that help in establishing the fact that whether or not the person moved
into different location within the DSA or came to the DSA as a return in- migrant. Second, it equips
its field offices with computers so that searching/verifying would be efficient. The following
questions are included to facilitate search for existing ID in the data base:
Matching questions
- ETHNICITY OF HEAD OF ORIGIN HOUSEHOLD?
- NAME OF AREA OF ORIGIN?
- NAME OF HEAD OF VILLAGE OF ORIGIN?
- NAME OF OWNER OF ORIGIN STRUCTURE?
- NAME OF AGENT FOR OWNER OF STRUCTURE OF ORIGIN?
- NAME UP TO FOUR SPOTS NEAR ORIGIN STRUCTURE?
- NAMES OF UP TO THREE INDIVIDUALS IN ORIGIN HOUSEHOLD?
- NAMES OF UP TO THREE INDIVIDUALS IN CLOSEST HOUSEHOLD?
- NAME OF HEAD OF ORIGIN HOUSEHOLD? Decide whether the household should be
assigned new ID or not
- DID YOU MOVE HERE TO FORM A NEW HOUSEHOLD; TO JOIN A HOUSEHOLD, OR
RELOCATE WITH WHOLE HOUSEHOLD?